DOGSO and red cards.

I refereed this weekend at quite a high profile event with teams from all around the country in attendance. Unfortunately I issued a number red cards for offences whereby an obvious goal scoring opportunity was denied. I must admit that I was reluctant to send the players off knowing they had travelled a long way to play in the tournament. The fact that as well as the red card only an indirect free kick is awarded which seldom leads to a goal,  So does the punishment fit the crime? Would it be better to award a penalty when a DOGSO offence occurs? Thereby reintroducing the goal scoring opportunity. A blue card could still be given and the player serve a timed suspension. 

Parents
  • We used the DOGSO/penalty/blue card local rule in our tournaments on Saturday and Sunday. I gave 3 penalties over the weekend and know of a couple more by other referees. It definitely felt easier giving the decisions knowing that it was only accompanied by a blue card. What was more interesting it was really noticeable that players made definite decisions NOT to run after attackers through on goal and thereby not committing DOGSO offences.

  • The other issue with DOGSO and a red card is the subsequent suspension if it takes place in a League game. One of our players received a red card, a penalty was given and had to serve a one tournament suspension (3/4 games). I think blue card and a penalty is sufficient punishment. 

Reply Children
No Data