Is it right to split my team in half based on ability?

I’m one of 8 or so coaches at an U7 team of 30+ kids. Now that they’re U7, we’re starting to play league games and the club has told us we need to split into two teams. 

At U6, we divided the team for training each week based on abilities. Some kids have been playing since they were 3, others were kicking a ball for the first time. The difference in ability was night and day so splitting made sense. 

This year, when registering the team for the league, we’ve kept the same arrangement; split based on ability. Now, there are some in both groups that are certainly comparable, but a line had to be drawn somewhere. 

The logic behind this was due to some of the players in the developing team literally playing one hour per week and being so far apart ability-wise from some of the top players that playing them together seemed unfair. 

Now the season has started, we’re getting complaints from the parents (who were already informed of how the groups would be divided at the end of last season), about how they feel their kid should a) be in a different group with their friends, b) groups should be completely mixed and c) concerns about what will happen this season if and when the developing team plays matches and get battered each week (which is a real possibility). 

As coaches, we can say as much as we want that the result doesn’t matter, but the kids don’t see it that way. 

It’s too late for us to change without incurring costs and most of the coaches are still happy with the way it’s split. 

Just looking for some advice on what we should do if others have experienced this? 

Parents
  • Most junior football clubs have an over-arching policy/belief as to how they setup and organise their football teams. Some stream their teams, so put kids of similar ability together, whereas others successfully run teams of mixed abilities. Both have their pro's and con's and its likely that in this forum, you'll see coaches who work in both systems.

    My initial advice to you is to go back to the Club Chair/Secretary and ask them if your club has a similar policy first and they might be able to provide you with guidance as to how this issue has been solved in other age groups.

    Failing that (or if they say "figure it out yourselves!"), you need to work out with the coaches what is best for the individual players, their love of the game and their development...NOT what is best for their parents.

    I am a coach at a club with six teams and 45ish kids and we have streamed on ability (i.e. the best players in 1, the next group in 2, etc) as we feel it is best for players to play with others of a similar level. This allows them to get equal time on the ball and have equal impact on matches and face competitive challenges at the right level. The mixed ability model can lead to lesser ability kids coming in and not touching the ball which impacts their confidence and love of the game (remember, that is the number one goal!). The opposite is also true in that you can have one exceptional player scoring 10+ goals each week and not being challenged at the right level - again not good for his/her development. We then reassess ever year/six months.

    The counter-argument about kids playing with friends from parents is simple - they'll make new friends through their football team which will be good for their confidence, etc.

    Regardless of team composition, you shouldn't be worried about your teams getting "thumped" every week as all leagues will try and put teams together of similar levels. Initially at U7s, your first few fixtures will be completely random but they'll soon recalibrate the leagues to ensure you get matched with similar ability teams after October half-term (and worth communicating this to parents). 

    I hope this helps in some small way!! Good luck.

Reply
  • Most junior football clubs have an over-arching policy/belief as to how they setup and organise their football teams. Some stream their teams, so put kids of similar ability together, whereas others successfully run teams of mixed abilities. Both have their pro's and con's and its likely that in this forum, you'll see coaches who work in both systems.

    My initial advice to you is to go back to the Club Chair/Secretary and ask them if your club has a similar policy first and they might be able to provide you with guidance as to how this issue has been solved in other age groups.

    Failing that (or if they say "figure it out yourselves!"), you need to work out with the coaches what is best for the individual players, their love of the game and their development...NOT what is best for their parents.

    I am a coach at a club with six teams and 45ish kids and we have streamed on ability (i.e. the best players in 1, the next group in 2, etc) as we feel it is best for players to play with others of a similar level. This allows them to get equal time on the ball and have equal impact on matches and face competitive challenges at the right level. The mixed ability model can lead to lesser ability kids coming in and not touching the ball which impacts their confidence and love of the game (remember, that is the number one goal!). The opposite is also true in that you can have one exceptional player scoring 10+ goals each week and not being challenged at the right level - again not good for his/her development. We then reassess ever year/six months.

    The counter-argument about kids playing with friends from parents is simple - they'll make new friends through their football team which will be good for their confidence, etc.

    Regardless of team composition, you shouldn't be worried about your teams getting "thumped" every week as all leagues will try and put teams together of similar levels. Initially at U7s, your first few fixtures will be completely random but they'll soon recalibrate the leagues to ensure you get matched with similar ability teams after October half-term (and worth communicating this to parents). 

    I hope this helps in some small way!! Good luck.

Children