why cant an u16 play u15 but a 15yr old can play upto u18?

i have a few players  u16 that are only 6 weeks older than the few lads in the u15,s 

My issue is the u16 can not play down where they could in a few games over the season could potentially build up better confidence more self esteem and not alwys worring about comparing themselves to their peers but just to people in general.

yes i do change pratices individually and as a team to combat this sometimes, but it will never stop a child ( yes child they are still children) compring themselves to what they think they are meant to be.

yet an u16 can play all the way up to u18 where in the real world of ages, like school ages means they could be coming up against adults.

I am not moaning about this if the player in all four corners can cope, but i think the younger players as metioned before could benifit more in all four corners, playing sometimes in the year below

Parents
  • Interesting point Lee. It would be interesting to see what the result would be if this was allowed in leagues. Could these types of opportunities be encouraged and set up by coaches informally? Especially by those who coach different aged teams.

  • i think it would be nothing but benificial for all involved Tim.

    we talk about developing players, first stop should be developing them as people, stopping obvious progression where some children can really benefit from, goes against the whole four corner model.,

    long term damage of children who can be closer in age, mentally and physically by a matter of  a few weeks  and not being able to play in the year below, is  a real danger in the whole social corner. not just in football but into their social lives also

    yes in "freindlies" this can be adopted., but in competition where peers can be instrumental in either praise or snide remarks can have a massive effect on sed players.

    teams shouldnt be lets say just u14's it should be u13,14      u14,15     u15,16 and so on

    this subject is something i am really passionate about

Reply
  • i think it would be nothing but benificial for all involved Tim.

    we talk about developing players, first stop should be developing them as people, stopping obvious progression where some children can really benefit from, goes against the whole four corner model.,

    long term damage of children who can be closer in age, mentally and physically by a matter of  a few weeks  and not being able to play in the year below, is  a real danger in the whole social corner. not just in football but into their social lives also

    yes in "freindlies" this can be adopted., but in competition where peers can be instrumental in either praise or snide remarks can have a massive effect on sed players.

    teams shouldnt be lets say just u14's it should be u13,14      u14,15     u15,16 and so on

    this subject is something i am really passionate about

Children